Stepan Barna in the "five" best of heads of regional state administration - a rating Committee of voters of Ukraine
the Committee of voters of Ukraine made up "Rating of activity of heads of regional state administration in 2016". The assessment was based on two criteria: the indicators of socio-economic development of regions and a survey of local experts. First place in the rating of governors was replaced by the head of the Kharkiv oblast Yulia Svetlichnaya. Kharkiv became the first indicators socialno-economic development in 2016 So, the index of industrial production rose to 106.7% (in Ukraine-102,4%), construction – 100.0% (in Ukraine 88,6%), agricultural production– by 106.5% (in Ukraine 106,1%). Local experts noted the work of regional state administration on assistance to participants of ATO. From 5426 statements of the participants of the ATO for the issue of land was granted in property 2951 land. This is the second result for Ukraine. In addition, according to experts, the head of the state administration managed to establish effective communication with regional Council. For example, the budget for 2017 was adopted by 99 votes in favour and none against. Also in the top five Oleg sinyutka (Lviv region), Sergey Kuzmenko (Kirovograd region), Stepan Barna (Ternopil region) and Gennady Moskal (Transcarpathia). Experts positively noted the activities of the Chairman of Lviv regional state administration (Oleg sinyutka) in infrastructure development and tourism. In particular, noted the effective implementation of the project on construction of roads at the expense of an overfulfillment of the plan on receipt of customs payments. The area is also among the leaders in the socio-economic development in Ukraine. Showed positive dynamics and the Kirovograd region (Sergey Kuzmenko). The region became the 2nd behind the growth of the industry and the 6th – with the development of agriculture. The area is also the second increase in capital investment. Revenues of local budgets (without transfers) increased from 2.5 thousand UAH. per person of the population in 2015, up to 3.7 thousand UAH. in 2016. Among the successes of the experts also noted the de-communization. The growth of social-economy development took place in the Ternopil oblast Stepan Barna). The area became 4th in Ukraine for the development of industry and the volume of construction works, 5th for foreign direct investment per capita. Experts positively noted the activities of the head of the regional state administration in the direction of decentralization. Ternopil region is the leader in Ukraine by quantity of United communities. Their 36. In addition, it was highly appreciated the introduction of e-procurement ProZorro. The five most effective heads of regional state administration also included the head of the Transcarpathian region Gennady Moskal. The region has shown a growth industry – 106% (in Ukraine-102,4%). There was also the growth of the index of construction products – to 102.9% (in Ukraine 114,1%). Highly appreciated the activities of the Chairman of regional state administration, local experts. In particular, commended the fight against smuggling. Probably a high result was facilitated by the tendency of Gennady Moskal to the maintenance of friendly relations with msaleem opinion leaders. Among antiliberal of the rating of heads of regional state administration Oleg Goncharuk (Ivano-Frankivsk oblast), Alexei Malyarenko (Rivne region), Alexander Feshchuk (Chernivtsi region), Valery Golovko (Poltava region) and Andrey Gordeev (Kherson region). Mostly they received the lowest results in the survey of experts and socio-economic development of the region. Ivano-Frankivsk region (Oleg Goncharuk) was one of the last in Ukraine in terms of the social-economy development. The rate of growth of agriculture was lower than in Ukraine (production of livestock products decreased by 5.4%). Index of construction output for the period January-December 2016 was only 4.4% more than the same period last year (in Ukraine – an increase of 13.1%). Experts praised the project "Ivano-Frankivsk region is a region for tourism". In 9 months of 2016, the region was visited by 2.2 million people. Rivne oblast (Alexey Malyarenko) was the last in Ukraine in terms of construction. The region has occupied one of last places in the index of industrial – 97,8% (in Ukraine-102,4%). Local experts had not noted the positives in the work of Alexei, Malyarenko on combating illegal production of amber. The problem for the Chernivtsi region (Alexander Feshchuk) the experts call anti-corruption in the region. In particular, noted that it was not overcome the issue of smuggling of goods (mainly cigarettes) to Romania. With the growth of industry and agriculture – the region is one of the last in Ukraine. Among the outsiders of the rating of Poltava region, Ukraine (Valeri Golovko). The experts negatively assessed the personnel policy of the President, administration, and pointed to a conflictual relationship with the regional Council. First of all, the question of issuing licenses gas enterprises. Indicators of social-economy development of the region is low. Poltava – 22-ha for the increase in the volume of construction works and 21-e – index of real wages. The last place in the ranking took the Kherson oblast (Andrey Gordeev). The experts noted the conflict of head of state administration with regional Council. In September 2016, was dismissed the head of the Kherson regional Council Andrey Putilov and elected a new Chairman. Controversial was the implementation of decentralization in the region. In particular, deputies of the Kherson regional Council advocated the abolition Perspektivnogo plan of formation of territories of communities. Kherson is also an outsider to the socio-economic development. Methodology. Socio-economic development of the region was evaluated in 10 areas: the development of industry, agriculture, the pace of construction, commissioning of housing, attracting investment, trade balance, employment and unemployment, wage increases, financial self-sufficiency and energy conservation. Data based on information of the State service of staticice and responses of relevant ministries and governors to queries of the SBI CVU. The expert survey was conducted by questionnaire. There are 16 directions. Among other things, questions were raised on the implementation of reforms (decentralization, simplification of administrative services, public procurement, fight against corruption, the personnel policy of the President, administration and cooperation with the regional Council, transparency of work and the like. In the expert survey involved 245 people. Mostly they were opinion leaders, political experts and media representatives. Max for his work as the head of RSA could get 10 points (5 – for social-economy development and 5 for the assessment from experts). This was reported in the Ternopil regional state administration.Ïåðåâåäåíî ñåðâèñîì "ßíäåêñ.Ïåðåâîä÷èê": translate.yandex.ru.
Source: http://uzinform.com.ua/
